The Stability of Fiber Spectrographs in the Faint-source Regime

Author:

Bundy KevinORCID,Law DavidORCID,MacDonald Nick,Westfall Kyle B.ORCID,Sivarani T.ORCID,Divakar Devika,Bershady MatthewORCID,Gu MengORCID,Yan RenbinORCID,Roy NamrataORCID,Poppett Claire,Drory NivORCID

Abstract

Abstract The use of optical fibers in astronomical instrumentation offers high-multiplex and light-gathering flexibility. However, with most previous fiber spectrographs optimized for large fields of view on modest-aperture telescopes, the performance of fibers in the context of faint targets on large telescopes remains largely untested. In this paper, we evaluate aspects of fiber stability, especially as they apply in the context of precision sky subtraction of faint sources at modest spectral resolution (R ∼ 3000). After introducing a framework for describing potential systematic errors, we use publicly available data from existing instruments, including instrumentation used by the fourth-generation Sloan Digital Sky Survey’s MaNGA project (MaNGA: Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory) and the Very Large Telescope’s FLAMES: Fiber Large Array Multi Element Spectrograph. We isolate sources of fiber systematics and estimate the observed amplitude of persistent residuals as well as stochastic noise contributions resulting from changing fiber stresses. Comparing these levels against their impact on various sky subtraction schemes demonstrates that 0.1% precision sky subtraction with fiber instruments is possible. As a demonstration, we show that the MaNGA instrument can deliver 0.2% residuals on bright near-IR sky lines with nonlocal sky subtraction, if pseudo-slit limitations are addressed by allocating 50% of its fibers to sky. We further highlight recently published deep exposures that achieved a 1σ background level of 27.6 AB per square arc second, equivalent to a precision of 0.2% of the sky background continuum.

Publisher

American Astronomical Society

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3