Abstract
Abstract
A prospective, sequential, controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical and cost consequences of securing arterial catheters with a precision-engineered securement device compared with tape and transparent membrane dressing (TMD). Tape and TMD securement resulted in an unscheduled catheter restart rate of 25%; the study device resulted in an unscheduled catheter restart rate of 12.8%. The difference was highly significant (P < .001).
Publisher
Association for Vascular Access
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献