Evaluation of measurement uncertainty after optimization of the method for potentiometric titration of glycine

Author:

Trajkovska Bojadjiska Elena1,Godzo Hrisanta1,Acevska Jelena1,Nakov Natalija1,Dimitrovska Aneta1,Brezovska Katerina1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmacy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Mother Theresa 47, 1000 Skopje, Republic of N. Macedonia

Abstract

Accuracy and repeatability of the results obtained by potentiometric determination mostly depend on the stoichiometric ratio between the quantity of titrant used and the quantity of sample to be examined. During the optimization of the method, care should be taken to adjust the sample amount to provide suitable volume of titrant, in order to avoid the titration error with consumption above 90% of the total burette volume. In this study suitable approach for optimization of method for potentiometric titration of glycine with 0.1 M perchloric acid was demonstrated, followed by evaluation of measurement uncertainty of the results. The results obtained from the method validation study (statistical error as estimate for precision, and proportional systematic error and additional systematic error as estimates of bias) were used for estimation of uncertainty of measurement of the result, using top-down approach. Comparable estimates for combined (0.5%) and expanded uncertainty (1.0%) were also obtained using two different approaches: bottom-up approach and top-down approach using data from participation in proficiency testing studies. Key words: potentiometric titration, measurement uncertainty, bottom-up / top-down approach

Publisher

Macedonian Pharmaceutical Association

Reference25 articles.

1. Acetic Acid. (n.d.). Accesed December 16, 2021. Available at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Acetic-acid

2. Barwick, V.J., Ellison, S.L.R., 2000. VAM Project 3.2.1 Development and Harmonisation of Measurement Uncertainty Principles Part (d): Protocol for uncertainty evaluation from validation data.

3. Council of Europe, 2021. European pharmacopoeia (10.7).

4. EDQM of the Council of Europe, 2014. Proficiency Testing Study 147: Potentiometric titration Final report. (document of restricted use).

5. EDQM of the Council of Europe, 2015. Technical guide for the elaboration of monographs 7th Edition.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3