Abstract
The article aims to reveal the rationality behind the customers’ choices of Islamic banks in Bengkulu province. For this purpose through exploring the possibility of unification between instrumental rationality and Islamic rationality, it will be identified empirically the essence of the customers’ choices of Islamic banks in Bengkulu, Indonesia. The analysis deployed a grounded theory approach. The data obtained was qualitative by involving at least 15 (fifteen) participants who volunteered and spread across several Islamic banks in Bengkulu Province. Therefore, an in-depth interview was conducted as a strategy to collect data related to the rationality behind customers’ choices for the product of Islamic banks in Bengkulu province. The main findings of this study is: “hybrid rationality was successfully identified behind the customers’ choices of Islamic banks in Bengkulu province. This rationality is a unification between instrumental rationality and Islamic rationality based on religiosity values—Sharī‘ah compliance. It is an evidence for categorizing the consumers’ choices of Islamic banks in Bengkulu as “the hybrid rationality.”
Publisher
University of Management and Technology
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Religious studies,History,Cultural Studies
Reference39 articles.
1. Achwan, Rochman. “Sosiologi Keuangan: Dulu Dan Kini.” [Financial Sociology then and Now]. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi 15, no. 1 (January 23, 2010): 59-67. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v15i1.3707.
2. Alam, S. S., R. Mohd, and B. Hisham. “Is Religiosity an Important Determinant on Muslim Consumer Behaviour in Malaysia?” Journal of Islamic Marketing 2, no. 1 (2011): 8396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831111115268.
3. Anthony Bryant, K. C. “Qualitative Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. New York: Sage Publication Ltd., 2011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111410638.
4. Broek, K. L. Van den., I. Walker, and C. A. Klöckner. “Drivers of Energy Saving Behaviour: The Relative Influence of Intentional, Normative, Situational and Habitual
5. Processes.” Energy Policy 132, no. November 2018 (2019): 811-819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.048.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献