Preferences of Students towards Conducting Qualitative Research in Social Sciences at Higher Education Level

Author:

Khalil Atif1,Saeed Muhammed1,Tauheed Kanwal2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab Lahore Pakistan

2. Virtual University, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

The study aimed to explore the intentions of higher education students towards conducting qualitative research in social sciences. The study included four PhD and six MPhil students from Punjab Univeristy (Institute of Education and Research) and Eduacation University who were selected through purposive sampling technique. A semi-structured interview protocol was constructed which was validated through experts’ opinion. The respondents were asked about their feelings, knowledge, skills, interests and barriers towards qualitative research. A thematic analysis was applied after obtaining the data through audio recording and field notes. The results revealed that most of the PhD scholars did not possess knowledge and skills required to conduct qualitative research. There was no visible difference between the responses of IER (PU) and EU students. But PhD and MPhil Students had different preferences towards conducting qualitative research.

Publisher

University of Management and Technology

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Aguiler, J. L. (1981). Insider research: An ethnography of a debate. In D. A. Messerschmidt (Ed.). Anthropologists at home in North America (pp. 15-26). New York: Cambridge University Press.

2. Bell, J. (2005). Doing your research project (4th ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

3. Bhati, K. S., Hoyt, W. T., & Huffman, K. L. (2013). Integration or assimilation? Locating qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.

4. Bonner, A., & Tolhurst, G. (2002). Insider / outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Researcher (through 2013), 9(4), 7.

5. Bowen, G. A. (2005). Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: Lessons learned. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 208-222.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3