Reframing Occidentalism: Purpose, Construction of Scientific Paradigms, and Reconstruction of Post-Orientalism Knowledge

Author:

Badarussyamsi BadarussyamsiORCID

Abstract

The current study aimed to reaffirm the framing of Occidentalism as an academic discipline that has a more constructive value, rather than placing it solely as a form of euphoric criticism and resistance to Orientalism and the West.  The decline of Occidentalism as an academic discipline has been caused by framing which narrows its intellectual activities and allows it to function only as a critique of Orientalism. Previous studies concluded that Occidentalism is only the anti-thesis of Orientalism, although how Occidentalism – as a scientific discipline – composes its scientific paradigm, is barely discussed. What does Occidentalism actually criticize and how does it construct its epistemology as an important scientific discipline? This question is important to elaborate on the existence of Occidentalism. The current research conducted an in-depth study of the opinions and arguments of scientists, such as Edward W. Said, Hassan Hanafi, Sayyid Qutb, and Seyyed Hossein Nasr. By investigating the domain of their views, especially on Orientalism and the West, critical and dialectical themes were also classified to find the epistemological construction of Occidentalism. The findings showed that Occidentalism has ontological, epistemological, and axiological constructs which dialectically reveal the weaknesses of Orientalism. However, a more exploratory and important finding is that the epistemological construction of Occidentalism is divided into four major dialectical streams. Firstly, the critique of civilizational values, secondly, revealing the ontological, epistemological, and axiological structures, thirdly, offering a balanced discipline of study, and fourthly the discovery of a new path for Western civilization.

Publisher

University of Management and Technology

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Religious studies,History,Cultural Studies

Reference49 articles.

1. Ahiska, Meltem. “Occidentalism: The Historical Fantasy of the Modern.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 102, no. 2 (2003): 351–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-102-2-3-351.

2. Akhavi, Shahrough. “Sayyid Qutb.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, edited by John L. Esposito, Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

3. Ali, Ameer. “From Islamophobia to Westophobia: The Long Road to Radical Islamism.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 3, no. 1 (2016): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797015626792.

4. Allison, Katherine. “American Occidentalism and The Agential Muslim Woman.” Review of International Studies, 2013, 665–84.

5. Assyaukenie, Luthfi. “Perlunya Oksidentalisme: Wawancara Dengan Doktor Hassan Hanafi,” ["The Need for Occidentalism: An Interview With Doctor Hassan Hanafi"] Journal Ulumul Qur’ān, No. 5 (1994).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3