Clinical course of ascitic syndrome and acute kidney injury in the setting of nonselective beta‑blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prevention of bleeding in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation

Author:

Korobka R. V.1,Gautier S. V.2,Pasechnikov V. D.3,Pak E. S.1,Shapovalov A. M.4,Khoronko Yu. V.5,Pasechnikov D. V.6,Porshennikov I. A.7

Affiliation:

1. Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital; Rostov State Medical University

2. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs; Sechenov University

3. Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital; Stavropol State Medical University

4. Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

5. Rostov State Medical University

6. Stavropol State Medical University

7. Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Novosibirsk State Medical University

Abstract

Objective: to compare the effects of nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) on patient survival, ascites dynamics, and development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during primary prevention of bleeding from the esophageal varices and cardia in patients with decompensated cirrhosis on the liver transplant waiting list (LTWL). Materials and methods. A retrospective comparative study of the clinical data of patients with severe ascites and esophageal varices without a bleeding history at the time of their inclusion in the LTWL was performed. Group 1 patients (n = 84) were prescribed NSBB, alpha and beta-adrenoblockers in order to prevent bleeding and reduce progression of decompensated cirrhosis. Group 2 patients underwent EVL. Results. Demographic, laboratory and instrumental parameters of patients in the compared groups had no significant differences. In both groups, there were no significant differences between the indicators of severity of liver lesions (MELD-Na, Child–Turcotte–Pugh), frequency of severe ascites, frequency of varicose nodes grades 2–3. At follow-up, bleeding developed in 22 patients (13.25%) – 13 patients in the NSBB group and 9 patients in the EVL group (15.47% and 10.97%, respectively, p > 0.05). Patient survival was significantly higher in the EVL group than in the NSBB group. Incidence of refractory ascites, number of patients with grade 3 ascites, and AKI stages 2–3 in the NSBB group, were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in the EVL group. MELD-Na was the independent predictor of mortality in the EVL group, while low mean arterial pressure (mAP) and presence of AKI were those for patients receiving NSBB. Conclusion. NSBB and EVL are effective methods of primary prevention of bleeding. Mortality rate, number of patients with refractory ascites and severe ascites, and number of patients with AKI stages 2–3 were higher in the NSBB group than in the EVL cohort. In EVL patients, the independent predictor of death was MELD-Na, while in NSBB patients, the independent predictors of mortality were low mAP and presence of AKI.

Publisher

V.I. Shimakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3