Affiliation:
1. Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital;
Rostov State Medical University
2. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs;
Sechenov University
3. Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital;
Stavropol State Medical University
4. Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital
5. Rostov State Medical University
6. Stavropol State Medical University
7. Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital;
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Abstract
Objective: to compare the effects of nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) on patient survival, ascites dynamics, and development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during primary prevention of bleeding from the esophageal varices and cardia in patients with decompensated cirrhosis on the liver transplant waiting list (LTWL). Materials and methods. A retrospective comparative study of the clinical data of patients with severe ascites and esophageal varices without a bleeding history at the time of their inclusion in the LTWL was performed. Group 1 patients (n = 84) were prescribed NSBB, alpha and beta-adrenoblockers in order to prevent bleeding and reduce progression of decompensated cirrhosis. Group 2 patients underwent EVL. Results. Demographic, laboratory and instrumental parameters of patients in the compared groups had no significant differences. In both groups, there were no significant differences between the indicators of severity of liver lesions (MELD-Na, Child–Turcotte–Pugh), frequency of severe ascites, frequency of varicose nodes grades 2–3. At follow-up, bleeding developed in 22 patients (13.25%) – 13 patients in the NSBB group and 9 patients in the EVL group (15.47% and 10.97%, respectively, p > 0.05). Patient survival was significantly higher in the EVL group than in the NSBB group. Incidence of refractory ascites, number of patients with grade 3 ascites, and AKI stages 2–3 in the NSBB group, were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in the EVL group. MELD-Na was the independent predictor of mortality in the EVL group, while low mean arterial pressure (mAP) and presence of AKI were those for patients receiving NSBB. Conclusion. NSBB and EVL are effective methods of primary prevention of bleeding. Mortality rate, number of patients with refractory ascites and severe ascites, and number of patients with AKI stages 2–3 were higher in the NSBB group than in the EVL cohort. In EVL patients, the independent predictor of death was MELD-Na, while in NSBB patients, the independent predictors of mortality were low mAP and presence of AKI.
Publisher
V.I. Shimakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs