Organization of courts operation in Ukraine in the period of martial law: comparative and legal research

Author:

Teremetskyi VladyslavORCID,Zhuravlov DmitroORCID,Boiko ViacheslavORCID,Stratonov VasylORCID,Ilchenko OleksandrORCID,Glukh MarynaORCID,Chudyk NataliіaORCID

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to highlight the situation of courts operation’s organization in the period of the martial law and the construction of legal framework on using modern information technologies in the administration of justice. The research has been carried out with the usage of the methods of systemic analysis and synthesis, comparative and legal, historical and legal methods. It has been clarified that Ukraine rather effectively ensures the proper organization of courts operation and administration of justice in terms of the martial law considering the level of security in each region. It has been indicated that the organization of remote work of judges and other court employees, as well as the administration of justice online through the use of video conferencing is the positive solution in war period. Such a step contributes to strengthening the security of all participants in judicial proceedings. It has been substantiated that the use of video conferencing during court hearings meets the requirements of a fair and public trial ensuring the compliance with the guarantees of access to justice. It has been emphasized that the use of information technologies within judicial proceedings should have a single approach. Therefore, it is important to develop uniform rules regarding methodological ensuring the use of modern information technologies in the administration of justice in the period of the martial law in order to improve the organization of courts operation.

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

Subject

Materials Science (miscellaneous)

Reference29 articles.

1. Analysis of Legislative Initiatives to Improve the Legislation of Ukraine on the Conduct of Legal Proceedings in Remote (Online) Mode in the Conditions of Martial Law or State of Emergency. (2022). https://rm.coe.int/analysis-of-legislative-initiatives-regarding-judicial-proceedings-in-/1680a99fbf

2. Asciutto v. Italy – 35795/02. Judgment 27.11.2007. § 64. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22appno%22:[%2235795/02%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-83510%22]}

3. Chesterman, S. (2002). Justice Under International Administration: Kosovo, East Timor and Afghanistan. https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/justice_under_intl.pdf

4. Decision of the Council of Judges of Ukraine "On Taking Urgent Measures to Ensure Sustainable Functioning of the Judiciary in Ukraine in the Context of Termination of Powers of the High Council of Justice and Martial Law in Connection with the Armed Aggression by the Russian Federation". (2022). https://rsu.gov.ua/ua/news/opublikovano-risenna-rsu-sodo-vzitta-nevidkladnih-zahodiv-dla-zabezpecenna-stalogo-funkcionuvanna-sudovoi-vladi-v-ukraini

5. Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 231/2021 (June 11, 2021) On the Strategy for the Development of the Justice System and Constitutional Justice for 2021-2023. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/231/2021#Text

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Guaranteeing russia’s responsibility for war crimes in Ukraine: the information and legal aspect;Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs;2024-06-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3