Edoxaban and/or colchicine for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 managed in the out-of-hospital setting (CONVINCE): a randomized clinical trial

Author:

Landi Antonio12,Morici Nuccia3,Vranckx Pascal4,Frigoli Enrico1,Bonacchini Luca5,Omazzi Barbara6,Tresoldi Moreno7,Camponovo Claudio8,Moccetti Tiziano9,Windecker Stephan10,Valgimigli Marco1210

Affiliation:

1. Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC)

2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland

3. IRCCS S. Maria Nascente – Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy

4. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium

5. Emergency Department, ASST Great Metropolitan Hospital Niguarda

6. Emergency Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese

7. Unit of General Medicine and Advanced Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

8. Department of Anesthesiology, Clinica Ars Medica, Genolier Swiss Medical Network, Gravesano

9. Studi Medici Riuniti & Partners, Lugano

10. Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

The optimal pharmacological management of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) managed outside the hospital remains largely unsettled. In the investigator-initiated, open-label CONVINCE trial, 59 outpatients with COVID-19 were randomized (2 × 2 factorial design) to colchicine versus no treatment (anti-inflammatory comparison) or edoxaban versus no treatment (anticoagulation comparison). The study had two co-primary outcomes (one for each randomization): major vascular thrombotic events (MVTE, the composite of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis [DVT], symptomatic proximal or distal DVT, symptomatic pulmonary embolism or thrombosis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, non-central nervous system embolism and death) at 25 ± 3 days for the anticoagulation comparison and the composite of SARS-CoV-2 detection rates or freedom from death or hospitalizations at 14 ± 3 days for the anti-inflammatory comparison. The trial was prematurely halted due to slow recruitment and availability of effective vaccines. Overall, 16 patients were randomized to edoxaban plus colchicine, 13 to edoxaban, 14 to colchicine and 16 to standard of care. The study showed no significant difference in the two co-primary outcomes with edoxaban and/or colchicine versus standard of care. However, these results should be interpreted in light of the low-risk profile of included patients and the premature termination of the trial.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3