Left-to-right ventricular volume ratio and outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Author:

Aimo Alberto12,Teis Albert3,Kasa Gizem3,Juncà Gladys3,Lupón Josep3,Domingo Mar3,Ferrer Elena3,Vallejo Nuria3,Cediel Germán3,Codina Pau3,López-Ayerbe Jorge3,Georgiopoulos Georgios145,Martini Nicola2,Emdin Michele12,Bayes-Genís Antoni367,Rapezzi Claudio458,Delgado Victoria39

Affiliation:

1. Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna

2. Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy

3. Heart Institute, Hospital University Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona

4. King's College, London, UK

5. Cardiology Centre, University of Ferrara, Ferrara

6. CIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid

7. Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

8. Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola (Ravenna), Italy

9. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands

Abstract

Background Age-specific and gender-specific reference values for left ventricular (LV) and right ventricle volumes are available. The prognostic implications of the ratio between these volumes in heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have never been evaluated. Methods We examined all HFpEF outpatients undergoing a cardiac magnetic resonance from 2011 to 2021. The left-to-right ventricular volume ratio (LRVR) was defined as the ratio between the LV and right ventricle end-diastolic volume indexes (LVEDVi/RVEDVi). Results Among 159 patients [median age 58 years (interquartile range 49–69), 64% men, LV ejection fraction 60% (54–70%)] the median LRVR was 1.21 (1.07–1.40). Over 3.5 years (1.5–5.0), 23 patients (15%) experienced all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization, and 22 (14%) cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. The risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization increased with an LRVR less than 1.0 or at least 1.4. An LRVR less than 1.0 was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization [hazard ratio 5.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67–21.28; P = 0.006] and cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 5.68, 95% CI 1.58–20.35; P = 0.008) as compared with LRVR 1.0–1.3. Furthermore, an LRVR at least 1.4 was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 4.10, 95% CI 1.58–10.61; P = 0.004) and cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 3.71, 95% CI 1.41–9.79; P = 0.008) as compared with LRVR 1.0–1.3. These results were confirmed in patients without dilation of either ventricle. Conclusion LRVR values less than 1.0 or at least 1.4 are associated with worse outcomes in HFpEF. LRVR may become a valuable tool for risk prediction in HFpEF.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3