Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Published:2023-04-14 Issue: Volume:12 Page:
ISSN:2050-3377
Container-title:Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev

Author:

Schaack David¹^ORCID,Schmidt Boris²^ORCID,Tohoku Shota¹^ORCID,Bordignon Stefano¹^ORCID,Urbanek Lukas¹^ORCID,Ebrahimi Ramin¹,Hirokami Jun¹^ORCID,Efe Tolga Han¹^ORCID,Chen Shaojie³^ORCID,Chun KR Julian³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany

2. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik 3 – Klinik für Kardiologie, Frankfurt, Germany

3. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Die Sektion Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

Abstract

Catheter ablation is a widely used, effective and safe treatment for AF. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), as a novel energy source for cardiac ablation, has been shown to be tissue selective and is expected to decrease damage to non-cardiac tissue while providing high efficacy in pulmonary vein isolation. The FARAPULSE ablation system (Boston Scientific) follows the idea of single-shot ablation and is the first device approved for clinical use in Europe. Since its approval, multiple high-volume centres have performed increasing numbers of PFA procedures in patients with AF and have published their experiences. This review summarises the current clinical experience regarding the use of PFA for AF using the FARAPULSE system. It provides an overview of its efficacy and safety.

Publisher

Radcliffe Media Media Ltd

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Rubinsky B, Onik G, Mikus P. Irreversible electroporation: a new ablation modality — clinical implications. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2007;6:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/153303460700600106; PMID: 17241099.

2. Koruth J, Kuroki K, Iwasawa J, et al. Preclinical evaluation of pulsed field ablation: electrophysiological and histological assessment of thoracic vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019;12:e007781. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007781; PMID: 31826647.

3. Koruth JS, Kuroki K, Kawamura I, et al. Pulsed field ablation versus radiofrequency ablation: esophageal injury in a novel porcine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2020;13:e008303. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008303; PMID: 31977250.

4. Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:1789–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.016; PMID: 22820056.

5. Stewart MT, Haines DE, Miklavčič D, et al. Safety and chronic lesion characterization of pulsed field ablation in a porcine model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021;32:958–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14980; PMID: 33650743.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Efficacy and safety of pulsed‐field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;Journal of Arrhythmia;2024-07-18

2. Focal pulsed field ablation in complex atrial tachycardia: First clinical experience and 1-year outcome;Heart Rhythm;2024-07

3. Use of pulse field ablation in the treatment of an atrial tachycardia: A case report;Clinical Case Reports;2024-06

4. Endocardial Pulsed Field Ablation and the Oesophagus: Are Atrio-oesophageal Fistulas Now History?;Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review;2024-03-07

5. Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Review and a Look into its Future;The Heart Surgery Forum;2024-02-22