Overview of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Flow Ratio in the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Overview of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Flow Ratio in the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions

Published:2020-08-14 Issue: Volume:14 Page:
ISSN:1758-390X
Container-title:US Cardiology Review
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Westra Jelmer¹,Tu Shengxian²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark

2. School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI. Advances in computational technology have resulted in the development of solutions, enabling fast derivation of FFR from imaging data in the catheterization laboratory. The quantitative flow ratio is currently the most validated approach to derive FFR from invasive coronary angiography, while the optical flow ratio allows faster and more automation in FFR computation from intracoronary optical coherence tomography. The use of quantitative flow ratio and optical flow ratio has the potential for swift and safe identification of lesions that require revascularization, optimization of PCI, evaluation of plaque features, and virtual planning of PCI.

Publisher

Radcliffe Group Ltd

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394; PMID: 30165437.

2. Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the International multicenter FAVOR pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:2024–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013; PMID: 27712739.

3. Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: an individual patient-data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019;94:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28283; PMID: 30963676.

4. Yu W, Huang J, Jia D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-derived fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. EuroIntervention 2019;15:189–97. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00182; PMID: 31147309.

5. Huang J, Emori H, Ding D, et al. Comparison of diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based and angiography-based fractional flow reserve for evaluation of coronary stenosis. EuroIntervention 2020. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01034; PMID: 31951207; epub ahead of press.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics—Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization;Diagnostics;2023-06-19

2. Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Assessment: Current Developments and Future Perspectives;Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications;2023

3. Quantitative flow ratio to predict long-term coronary artery bypass graft patency in patients with left main coronary artery disease;The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging;2022-08-28

4. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law;Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions;2021-03-04

5. Predicting post stent fractional flow reserve virtually from quantitative flow ratio – Can we really get there from here?;Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions;2020-11