Allometric Indexing of Left Ventricular Mass in Echocardiography: Differences Between Men and Women

Author:

Sahlén Anders1ORCID,Teo Muh Tyng2,Hamid Nadira3ORCID,Huang Weiting2ORCID,Del Rosario Agpaoa Abigail2,Ruan Wen2ORCID,Ewe See Hooi2,Yeo Khung Keong2ORCID,Ding Zee Pin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

2. National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore

3. National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Centre, NY, US

Abstract

Background: As echocardiographic left ventricular mass does not scale linearly with body surface area, indexing of left ventricular mass to height raised to the power exponent b has been proposed (‘allometric indexing’). Pooling data from males and females has been reported to lead to a higher value of b than when each sex is considered separately. We wished to determine if this is due to within-sex clustering, as this would change both how optimal b should be determined and how indexing should be performed. Methods: Echocardiograms were performed in rigorously screened healthy subjects (96 men, 133 women), and b was calculated as the relationship between left ventricular mass and body height. Results: Clustering was detected within men and women through analysis of regression model residuals, violating assumptions of independence. A hierarchical model was built to allow for clustering, and compared with treating males and females as separate populations using Bayesian regression. Bayes factor analysis showed greatest credibility of the clustered model with optimal b determined as 1.64 (0.68–2.82) and 0.96 (0.17–1.73) in men and women, respectively. Conclusion: Data from men and women are best suited to multilevel modelling, and b should therefore not be estimated after pooling. This indicates that allometric indexing may require sex-specific values either for the power exponent or for any subsequently derived reference ranges.

Publisher

Radcliffe Media Media Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3