Abstract
Is there any difference between dyadic and group attachment? Following Bowlby's (1982) beliefs, attachment is important across the lifespan: dependent on the early sensitive caregiving, we seek out for others ( family members, peer groups and lovers) to fulfill our different needs. The refined mental representations also include our experiences of receiving protection and care in groups and influence our perception and action in future situations. Based upon the AAP (George, 1999), which provides a developmental approach to the assessment of the dyadic adult attachment system, this study tries to extend the projective test by measuring patterns of group attachment. The AGAP-Test (Adult Group Attachment Projective Picture Test) contains a series of eight pictures that activate the unconscious "group attachment system" and tries to give via patients narrative insight in secure, insecure or disorganized schemes and defensive processes against anxiety, suffering and pain in repeated former experiences in groups. The AGAP Test is currently in development and used in the measurement of the change of group attachment related mental representations in individuals during long-term psychodynamic group therapy. The second approach tries to give insight into attachment related social unconscious processes such as defense and coherence via guiding the "group as unity" to absolve the projective test. For the "healthy" reference groups, the narratives of eight group analytic trainee groups at the GRAS (Gruppenanalyseseminar e.V.) Institute in Bonn, Germany, have been collected. To illustrate the effectiveness of aspects relevant to group attachment, the test is also frequently used in the supervision and further training of adult student groups.
Reference46 articles.
1. Akhtar S., Kramer S. (1997). The Seasons of Life: Separation-Individuation Perspectives. London: Karnac.
2. Ammaniti M., Gallese V. (2014). The Birth of Intersubjectivity. Psychodynamics, Neurobiology, and the Self. London: Norton.
3. Badenoch B., Gantt S. (2013). The interpersonal neurobiology of group psychotherapy and group process. London: Karnac.
4. Bateman A., Fonagy P. (2016). Mentalization based treatment for personality disorders: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bowlby J. (1980). Verlust, Trauer und Depression. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.