Abstract
The study aimed to verify the psychometric properties of the NEO-PI-R Slovak translation. The self-report sample consisted of 1.062, a retested sample of 122, and an observer rater of 371 persons. In self-assessments, Cronbach's alfa of domains ranged from .88 (Openness) to .92 (Neuroticism). In observer ratings, the reliability ranged from .89 (Extraversion) to .95 (Conscientiousness). The stability of the test-retest showed an average correlation of r = .81 after three months. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors that explained the variance of 60.45%. The agreement between the observers and the self-assessments was at a mean level of .58. The Slovak translation of NEO-PI-R follows the psychometric standards for reliability and construct validity. The study did not follow the educational level and mental health of the research participants.
Reference44 articles.
1. Aluja, A., García, O., García, L.F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the “NEO-PI-R” factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879-1889.
2. Benešová, A. (2012). Zhoda pri posudzovaní osobnosti partnerských dvojíc. [Consistency in the rating and self-assessment of personality in partners/spouses]. Bachelor thesis, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava.
3. Branco e Silva, L., & Laher, S. (2012). Exploring the Utility of the NEO-PI-R in a Sample of South African University Students. IFE Psychologia, 20(1), 19-48.
4. Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Hahn, R., & Comrey, A.L. (2001). Factor analyses of the NEO-PI-R Inventory and the Comrey Personality Scales in Italy and the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 217-228.
5. Cheek, J.M. (1982). Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: Apeer-rating study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1254-1269.