Doxastic managerial practice and management of the market economy

Author:

Bran Florina,I. Gâf-Deac Ioan,Radulescu Carmen-Valentina,Crizantema Vîlcu (Tanase) Elena,Burlacu Sorin,Loredana Popescu Maria,Alexandru Bodislav Dumitru

Abstract

In the article we examined the plan for advanced concern about human perceptu-al horizons, based on deeper knowledge, to prove the faith in organization and management. In particular, we explored the premises of doxometric management, plausibility structures in relation to static or dynamic doxastic managerial attitudes to build neighborhood structures to increase decision confidence. We believe that in the first quarter of the 21st century it is not so much historical events, the Inter-net or electronic commerce, or technology in general that determine societal influ-ences and changes, but rather knowledge management. There have been and are unprecedented changes in the human condition. It is possible, from a sociological perspective, to show the end of modernity considering that managers and people, in general, those in developed Western societies, in particular, have already come under a strong rationality. No one dares to conceptually touch the market econo-my. We come to the conclusion that a new type of management is needed. It is about doxastic organization and leadership, by measuring trust and opening the borders of neighborhood structures.

Publisher

Franco Angeli

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Strategy and Management,Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Reference25 articles.

1. Baltag A. and Moss L.S. (2004). Logics for Epistemic Programs. Synthese, 139(2): 165-224.

2. Bergson H. (1998). Creative Evolution. Bucharest: Ed. Institutul European, p. 137.

3. Blaga L. (1946). The Trilogy of Values: Science and Creation, Magical Thinking and Religion, Art and Value, reed. 2013. Bucharest: Ed. Humanitas, pp. 7-8.

4. Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: J. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, pp. 241-258.

5. Carnap R. (1950). Empiricism, Semantics, Ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4: 20-40.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3