Author:
De Luca Francesco,Phan Ho-Tan-Phat
Abstract
Purpose Risk-related information is prevalently used in the decision-making process by various counterparties. Therefore, this study investigates how compa-nies conduct their risk-disclosure practice after the new Italian Legislative Decree No. 254 of December 30, 2016. In particular, we draw attention to three aspects: (1) the interaction relationship among risk or risk management (RRM), industry, type of risk, and level of specific disclosure; (2) the variation of specific level of disclosing risk-related information across the industries and types of risk; and (3) the different behavior between risk and risk-management disclosure in the after-math of the regulation's issuance. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on a sample of large un-dertakings and groups that are subject to the Legislative Decree. Two phases of content analysis were executed to analyze the risk and risk-management disclosure. The research questions were investigated with the row effects loglinear model. Findings Our result shows that there are interaction relationships among RRM, type of risk, industry, and level of specific disclosure. Companies provide risk-related information at different levels of specificity depending on whether the information is risk description or risk management, the firms are operating in manu-facturing or nonmanufacturing, and the type of risk that the firms disclosed in their reports. Practical implications The paper provides evidence of inconsistent company behavior in disclosing company-specific information in favor of internal and ex-ternal stakeholders, particularly by balancing company-specific disclosure be-tween risk descriptions and risk-management policies. Policymakers might also consider this current phenomenon to decide to what extent disclosure requirements should be detailed and, instead, what room should be left for management discre-tion with respect to users' needs. Originality/value This paper is an up-to-date assessment of Italian firms' compliance with Legislative Decree No. 254 of December 30, 2016.
Reference47 articles.
1. Abraham S. and Cox P. (2007), Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports, The British Accounting Review, 39(3),
2. Abraham S. and Shrives P.J. (2014), Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports, The British Accounting Review, 46(1), pp. 91-107,
3. Agresti A. (1984), Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons).
4. Agresti A. (2013), Categorical Data Analysis (3rd ed.). (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons).
5. Ahmed K. and Courtis J.K. (1999), Association between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: A meta analysis, British Accounting Review, 31(1), pp. 35-61,
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献