Author:
Bella Michela,Brioschi Maria Regina
Abstract
This article proposes an integrative reading of Peirce's and James's philosophies, which aims to figure out the main features of a shared pragmatist metaphysics. Two methodologies are adopted to reach this goal: a historical scrutiny of sources (letters, works, manuscripts), prevalent in the first part, and a theoretical investigation of Peirce's and James's philosophies, in the second and third parts. The first part analyzes Peirce's and James's proximity, which lies in their common understanding of pragmatism as an anti-dogmatic method in philosophy, and their alleged main difference, which is represented by the issue of nominalism/anti-nominalism, and pivots around the concepts of individuals and generals. The article challenges the mainstream interpretation that sees Peirce as a champion of generality and continuity, whereas James is known for being an ardent defender of individuality. The arguments supporting such an unconventional interpretation are offered in the second part, which explores Peirce's view of individuality in logic, and the third one, dedicated to James's view of continuity in psychology. As a conclusion, Peirce and James's shared pragmatic metaphysics turns out to be centered on the dynamical bonding between individuals and generals.
Reference64 articles.
1. - Anderson 2008: Douglas R. Anderson, Peirce and Pragmatism: American Connections, in Cheryl Misak (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy (pp. 38–59), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
2. - Atkin 2005: Albert Atkin, Peirce on the Index and Indexical Reference, «Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society», 41 (2005) , 1, pp. 161-88.
3. - Atkins 2015: Richard K. Atkins, Peirce’s “Paradoxical Irradiations” and James’s The Will to Believe, «Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society», 51 (2015), 2. pp. 173-200.
4. - Atkins 2018: Richard K. Atkins, Charles S. Peirce’s Phenomenology: Analysis and Consciousness, New York, Oxford University Press 2018.
5. - Bella 2019a: Michela Bella, Ontology After Philosophical Psychology. The Continuity of Consciousness in William James’s Philosophy of Mind, Lexington, Lanham 2019.