Control of marriage and (im)mobility in Venice (16th-­17th centuries) in dialogue with Cultures of Vigilance

Author:

Bernardi Teresa

Abstract

This paper analyses the interactions between the control of marriage and human mobility in early modern Venice. It examines the role that ordinary people and local communities played in controlling migrants' mobility and marital unions. In particular, it shows the ways in which the religious authorities attempted to collect information about mobile actors in order to prevent the crime of bigamy. The research focuses particularly on the intermediaries and the networks through which oral testimonies and certificates were conveyed, both locally and trans-locally. To do so, the author uses a specific archival source, the so-called processetti matrimoniali: namely, pre-matrimonial enquiries aimed at attesting the marital status of foreigners, widows and widowers, and other mobile actors (i.e., merchants, sailors, and pilgrims) who wanted to get married in Venice. It is in this regard that the Venetian urban context will be analysed as a case study for discussing the historical perspectives of two recent books: The History and Cultures of Vigilance. Historicizing the Role of Private Attention in Society, edited by A. Brendecke and P. Molino; and Riferire all'autorità. Denuncia e delazione tra Medioevo ed Età moderna, edited by M.G. Muzzarelli. Using the perspective of the "cultures of vigilance", instead of the surveillance approach, will help to counter the idea that the control of marriage was simply a top-down process, or a centralized disciplinary action. It will reveal that local and trans-local communities were important means of control, able to influence the effectiveness of administrative and government practices.

Publisher

Franco Angeli

Subject

History

Reference95 articles.

1. Adey P. et al. (a cura di) (2014), The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, London, Routledge.

2. Albani B. (2018), Sposarsi a Roma dopo il Concilio di Trento. Matrimonio e comunità forestiere attraverso le posizioni matrimoniali dell’inizio del XVII secolo, in Venire a Roma, restare a Roma. Forestieri e stranieri fra Quattro e Settecento, a cura di S. Cabibbo, A. Serra, Roma, Roma-Tre Press.

3. Alessi G. (1996), Discipline. I nuovi orizzonti del disciplinamento sociale, «Storica» 4, 2, pp. 7-37.

4. Alfieri F. (2018), The Necessary Vigilance. Erring Consciences and Sensitive Bodies in Catholic Moral Theology (Fifteenth-Seventeenth Centuries), in A. Brendecke, P. Molino (2018), pp. 29-50.

5. Antonielli L. (2015), Tra polizia sanitaria e polizia di prossimità: gli anziani di parrocchia nella Milano del Sei-Settecento, in La polizia sanitaria: dall’emergenza alla gestione della quotidianità, a cura di L. Antonielli, Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino, pp. 107-139.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3