Affiliation:
1. Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel/University of Bucharest
Abstract
Abstract
This article addresses René Descartes’ problematic interpretation of vegetative activities within his mechanistic programme for explaining all living operations. Initially, Descartes illustrates nutrition and digestion by means of the analogy between animals and hydraulic machines. His account has a glaring weakness: he fails to supply a functional explanation for vegetative operations. Several botanical notes collected in the Excerpta anatomica reveal Descartes’ later attempt to bridge this lacuna. His study of plants (1) provides him with material for an improved specification of vegetative activities, (2) helps to shape a mechanical vegetative power that regulates bodily constitution and growth, and (3) allows him to isolate a class of living beings. While a more thorough explanation of nutrition, digestion, and growth in mechanical terms surfaces, Descartes proposes plants as a suitable model organism to explain vegetative activities.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Automata, reason, and free will: Leibniz's critique of Descartes on animal and human nature;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2023-08
2. Animals;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2023
3. Plants;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2023
4. The Seed, the Tree, the Fruit, the Juice;Nuncius;2022-02-09
5. In the Beginning Was the Plant: The Plant-Animal Continuity in the Early Modern Medical Reception of Galen;International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées;2022