Affiliation:
1. University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Historians avoid studying the efficacy of therapy before the age of the double-blind randomised trial. A related topic that has been the cause of great confusion is the meaning of the placebo effect and the efficacy of placebos. Medical anthropology and sociology, although they do not usually study the past, offer extremely useful tools for dealing rationally with both issues. This study uses their methods, among others, to argue that the body’s response to specific therapy is only one component of understanding efficacy, and that the others are much more useful in historical studies, especially those of other cultures. The case studies given in this paper are based on largely medical texts from sixteenth- to seventeenth-century China.
Subject
Medicine (miscellaneous),Complementary and alternative medicine,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference53 articles.
1. ‘Garrison Lecture: How the Concept of Profession Evolved in the Work of Historians of Medicine’;Burnham;Bulletin of the History of Medicine,1996
2. ‘The Therapeutic Tug of War. The Imperial Physician-Patient Relationship in the Era of Empress Dowager Cixi (1874–1908)’;Chang,1998
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献