Affiliation:
1. National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)Research Unit on Science, Medicine, Health & Society (Cermes3)Paris
Abstract
What makes it possible for ayurvedic pharmaceutical objects to come into being? To answer this question, this paper takes an ontological route in line with local epistemologies, in which the objectness of the thing is itself taken as quite porous and susceptible to circumstances. This approach has much in common with science and technology studies: objects acquire meaning in a specific context, itself embedded in a relational network at a specific point in time and space. Here too, objects are unstable, transient and circumstantial. This has serious consequences since the connections around objects question, even destabilise, the very idea of objectivity. This article examines what is omitted in the discussions and practices on objectivity in technologically driven ayurvedic drug discovery and manufacturing. It discusses innovation processes within and beyond the lab and the way in which pharmaceutical objects absorb ideas, epistemologies, materials, or even policies. These considerations will provide a useful methodological framework to appreciate the kind of uncertainties and heterodoxies that characterise these therapeutic products.
Subject
Medicine (miscellaneous),Complementary and alternative medicine,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference73 articles.
1. ‘Randomized Controlled Crime: Postcolonial Sciences in Alternative Medicine Research’;Adams;Social Studies of Science,2002
2. ‘Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience’;Anderson;Social Studies of Science,2002
3. The Social Life of Things
4. ‘The Thing Itself’;Appadurai;Public Culture,2006
5. Colonizing the Body;Arnold,1993
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献