Affiliation:
1. Professor, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, md, USA, skastner@umd.edu
Abstract
The purpose of this state-of-the-field article is to take stock of the use of international relations theory in the study of cross-Strait relations since 2000. To what degree have studies of cross-Strait relations made use of international relations theory since 2000, and to what degree has international relations theory provided useful insights for understanding Beijing–Taipei relations? I focus my attention on five topics in particular: the prospects for armed conflict in the Taiwan Strait; alliance/alignment politics and the u.s.–China–Taiwan triangular relationship; interactions between domestic politics (in Taipei and Beijing) and the cross-Strait dyadic relationship; cross-Strait economic integration in the shadow of political conflict; and the role of psychology, emotion, and identity in shaping cross-Strait interactions. For each topic, I survey recent studies that apply rigorous international relations theory to the cross-Strait relationship, and where appropriate I make suggestions for further development.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference105 articles.
1. Strategy, economic relations, and the definition of national interests’;Security Studies,1999/2000
2. Comprehending strategic ambiguity: u.s. security commitment to Taiwan,2001
3. Economic integration and peace: A game-theoretic analysis’;Journal of East Asian Studies,2007
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献