Affiliation:
1. Postdoc Fellow, Alexander von Humboldt Chair of Comparative Constitutionalism, Department of Political Science, University of Göttingen
Abstract
Summary
This article examines the origins, differentiation, and migration of constitutional entrenchment clauses from the beginning of modern constitutionalism until today. It is based on a broad understanding of ‘entrenchment clauses,’ covering all constitutional provisions that make amendments either to certain parts of a constitution or under certain circumstances more difficult to achieve than ‘normal’ amendments or even impossible, i.e., legally inadmissible. In particular, the article answers three questions: (1) When, and in which contexts, did the different types of constitutional entrenchment clauses emerge? (2) How have these types spread globally? (3) Which constitutional subjects do such clauses protect, and thus, which main functions do they aim to fulfill? The article is based on the new and unique Constitutional Entrenchment Clauses Dataset (CECD), which comprises 860 written national constitutions worldwide from 1776 until the end of 2015.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. La indefensión de la constitución neutral;Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional;2023-04-24
2. The politics of unconstitutional amendments in Bangladesh;The Law and Politics of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in Asia;2021-10-07
3. Debating the Amendment-Making Rule: The Rigidity vs. Flexibility Debate in the Turkish Constitution-Making Process;The Failure of Popular Constitution Making in Turkey;2020-01-16