Affiliation:
1. 1 Indiana University Bloomington catwood@indiana.edu
Abstract
Mobility in pastoral societies has often been treated as either a necessity for efficient pastoral production or else as a method of avoiding state power. Yet both the examples of itinerance in medieval Europe and the attested itineraries of medieval Inner Asian rulers suggest that power projection, not power avoidance, was a key component of Turco-Mongolian imperial mobility. By using new historico-geographical evidence, the itineraries of several pre-Chinggisid and Mongol empire figures—Ong Qa’an, Batu, Ögedei, and Möngke—may be mapped. The results show that imperial itinerance must be distinguished from pastoral mobility. They also show that movement in vast agglomerations of mob-grazing herds was not just a temporary response to military crisis but continued long into the peacetime of the Mongol empire. These results challenge a functionalist understanding of mobility and state structures in Inner Asia.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference91 articles.
1. Vliianie perekhoda k osedlomu obrazu zhizni na preobrazovanie sotsial’nogo stroia, semeinobytovogo uklada i kul’tury prezhnikh kochevnikov i polukochevnikov (na primere Kazakhov i Kirgizov) [Influence of the switch to settled forms of life in the transformation of social structure, mode of family life, and culture of the former nomads and semi-nomads (in particular the Kazakhs and Kirghiz)];Abramzon,1973
2. Khirigsuurs, ritual and mobility in the Bronze Age of Mongolia;Allard;Antiquity,2005
3. The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献