Abstract
AbstractThis article assesses the salience for Central Asia of Ernest Gellner’s theories about Islam, modernity and nationalism. Gellner has argued that modernisation homogenises culture and that this process goes together with nationalism and certain changes of emphasis within Islam. In Central Asia, Soviet modernisation did not bring long-lasting cultural or social standardisation. Evidence for this is that the traditional respect given to the status of ‘saintly’ families has not disappeared, as Gellner would have predicted, but has continued, though in different forms in rural and urban societies. People in Central Asia have complex identities that may sometimes cross-cut the city agrarian divide. In this post-colonial modernising environment, nationalism has not swept all before it, but is regarded by many people with some suspicion.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Glorifying human qualities and condemning vices in Sufi Ahmad Yasawi’s poems;Cogent Arts & Humanities;2023-09-09
2. Migration within and from Uzbekistan;Religion and Forced Displacement in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia;2022-05-03
3. The Ismailis of Badakhshan;Routledge Handbook on Islam in Asia;2021-09-20
4. Options and Limits of Islam in Political Life in Post-Soviet Central Asia;Politické vedy;2019-03-13
5. Ethnographers, Functionaries, Mullahs, and the Making of “Muslims”;Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context;2019