Affiliation:
1. School of Education, Bar- Ilan UniversityIsrael
Abstract
AbstractThis study explores the validity of a novel theoretical model for assessing secularity and religiosity that proposes two dimensions — conceptual and inherited — in an effort to further refine the religious/secular dichotomy applied in research to date. These new dimensions describe the manner in which people structure their world, religious or secular world as the case may be, and the significance they ascribe to it. The study, conducted among grade 12 students (N=100) in state (secular) schools in Israel, revealed that only five of the eight types in the theoretical model are manifested empirically: three secular (conceptual, inherited and integrative) and two religious (conceptual and inherited). It posits that the concepts “religious” and “secular” are comprehensive and cannot fully describe the complexity of an individual’s self- and public definition in a modern, pluralistic world.
Subject
Religious studies,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference27 articles.
1. “Personal religious orientation and prejudice”;Allport;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1967
2. “A measure of religiosity for the Jewish population of Israel”;Ben Meir;Megamot,1979
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Holocaust as a Source for Religious Education and Reflection Among Adolescents in Israel;Reimagining the Landscape of Religious Education;2023
2. Introduction: Changing Perspectives and Themes of the Landscape of Religious Education;Reimagining the Landscape of Religious Education;2023
3. Cultural and Religious Identity;Special Religious Education in Australia and its Value to Contemporary Society;2021
4. Values Education;Special Religious Education in Australia and its Value to Contemporary Society;2021
5. Differences Between Religious and Secular Women Students in Judging Processes;Journal of Empirical Theology;2018-04-20