Affiliation:
1. Freie Universität Berlin Institute of Islamic Studies
Abstract
Abstract
This article traces the usage of scholarly categories in online public discourses in Indonesia and Malaysia. I make two main arguments: First, digital dissemination and discussion of such categories accelerate and distort the reductions that are part of scholarly work. Second, these reductions in online debates contribute to a homogenization of positions on Islam on the level of actors as well as the level of arguments. Muslim authority on matters of creed has become more monopolized by a small group of scholars since the mid-2000s, and a broad spectrum of positions has become concentrated into a few homogenized group identities. This homogenization is driven by the increased use of new media, especially the internet. One effect of this is that more extreme positions on Islamic interpretations have become acceptable in the public spheres in Southeast Asia.
Subject
Anthropology,Communication,Cultural Studies
Reference125 articles.
1. ‘Where Does Malay Come from? Twenty Years of Discussions about Homeland, Migrations and Classifications’;Adelaar;Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde,2004
2. ‘The Virtual Presence of the Shaykh: Assembling the Social Media Interface of Habib Luthfi bin Yahya’;Alatas,2016
3. ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’;Althusser,1968
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献