Affiliation:
1. King’s University CollegeWestern UniversityCanada
2. University of TorontoCanada
Abstract
Objectives: Children’s views and experiences of shared care arrangements post separation were explored to provide their voices to the ongoing discussions of shared parenting.
Methods: Qualitative synthesis included a systematic and transparent method for retrieval, screening, and analysing qualitative studies. The inclusion criteria accepted studies that were: qualitative in design; included children as participants in shared care parenting time post-separation.
Results: Ten qualitative studies in six different countries with 466 children and young adults were included in the final analysis. Children’s experiences of shared care parenting post separation were mixed and varied depending on contextual factors related to their relationship with both parents, as well the quality of these relationships and the flexibility/rigidity of the parenting arrangement.
Implications: Hearing from children and young adults directly helps to move the shared care debate away from binary arguments about sole versus shared care based on parents’ rights and advocacy views.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference59 articles.
1. Children’s voices in family court: Guidelines for judges meeting children;Family law Quarterly,2013
2. Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review;Journal of Family Psychology,2002
3. Judicial interviews with children in custody and access cases: Comparing experiences in Ontario and Ohio;International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family,2010
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献