Adults’ Endorsement of Children’s Protection and Participation Rights and Likelihood of Reporting Abuse

Author:

Bourke Ashling1,Morris Sonia23,Maunsell Catherine4

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Human Rights and Citizenship Education and School of Human Development, Institute of Education, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, Ashling.bourke@dcu.ie

2. Centre for Human Rights and Citizenship Education, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

3. School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, sonia.morris@ucdconnect.ie

4. Centre for Human Rights and Citizenship Education and School of Human Development, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, catherine.maunsell@dcu.ie

Abstract

Children’s rights only serve their purpose in as far as they are recognised as rights by those who can exercise them. This study examined a sample of Irish adults’ (predominantly students; n=83) perceptions of children’s participation and protection rights across two age groups of children (seven- and 14-year-olds). Participants completed the Perceptions of Children’s Rights Questionnaires and likelihood of reporting child abuse online. A within-groups four-factor anova examined differences between the perceptions participation and protection rights across the two age categories. Participants endorsed protection rights more than participation rights for both age groups and reported a higher endorsement of protection rights and a lower endorsement of participation rights for seven-year-olds compared with 14-year-olds. Participants were more likely to report the abuse of a seven-year-old compared with a 14-year-old, and participants’ endorsement of protection rights significantly predicted likelihood of reporting abuse. These findings have implications for how children’s rights are viewed in Irish society and how these rights may be enacted.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3