Affiliation:
1. Institut d’histoire des représentations et des idées dans les modernités
Abstract
Since Euclid, optics has been considered a geometrical science, which Aristotle defines as a “mixed” mathematical science. Hobbes follows this tradition and clearly places optics among physical sciences. However, modern scholars point to a confusion between geometry and physics and do not seem to agree about the way Hobbes mixes both sciences. In this paper, I return to this alleged confusion and intend to emphasize the peculiarity of Hobbes’s geometrical optics. This paper suggests that Hobbes’s conception of geometrical optics, as a mixed mathematical science, greatly differs from Descartes’s one, mainly because they do not share the same “mechanical conception of nature.” I will argue that Hobbes and Descartes also have in common the quest for a different kind of geometry for their optics, different from that of the Ancients. I will show that this departure is not recent since Hobbes’s approach is already evident in 1636, when he judges the demonstrations of his contemporary friends, Claude Mydorge and Walter Warner. Finally the paper broadly suggests what is noteworthy in Hobbes’s optics, that is, the importance of the idea of force in his mechanics, although he was not able to conceptualize it in other terms than “quickness.”
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Philosophy
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Explanations in Hobbes's Optics and Natural Philosophy;A Companion to Hobbes;2021-12-13
2. Imagination et passions chez Descartes et Hobbes;Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg;2020-12-12
3. Hobbes and Mersenne;International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées;2020
4. Power of Vision. Hobbes' De Homine between Optical and Political Science;SCI POLITICA;2019