Affiliation:
1. University of Colombo Department of International Relations Sri Lanka Colombo
Abstract
Abstract
Voting is predominantly understood through resident citizens’ viewpoints. Many resident citizens are nervous about the perceived consequences of voting by resident noncitizens. Although New Zealand is the only Western democratic host country that currently allows noncitizens to vote in national elections, citizens have concerns about how noncitizens use this right. This study investigates noncitizen voting from noncitizens’ viewpoints, by exploring the journeys and experiences of Sri Lankan immigrants in New Zealand. Based on 26 interviews with Sri Lankans in Auckland and Wellington, the study found two dimensions—temporal and transnational—that shape immigrants’ views in a different way from those of resident citizen voters. Building on Bridget Anderson’s methodological de-nationalism, the study suggests that we need to recognise the differences between resident citizens and resident noncitizens in order not to homogenise groups and wrongly assume that they share motives and behavioural and decision-making patterns.
Reference56 articles.
1. Altman, D., S. Huertas-Hernández and C.T. Sánchez. 2023. ‘Two paths towards the exceptional extension of national voting rights to noncitizen residents’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49 (10): 2541–2560.
2. Anderson, B. 2019. ‘New directions in migration studies: towards methodological de-nationalism’, Comparative Migration Studies, 7 (1): 1–13.
3. Antunes, R. 2010. ‘Theoretical models of voting behaviour’, Exedra, 4: 145–170.
4. Arkilic, Z.A. 2016. ‘Between the homeland and host states: Turkey’s diaspora policies and immigrant political participation in France and Germany’. PhD dissertation: University of Texas, Austin.
5. Arunatilake, N., S. Jayasuriya and S. Kelegama. 2001. ‘The economic cost of the war in Sri Lanka’, World Development, 29 (9): 1483–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00056-0