Affiliation:
1. 1Utrecht University, Department of History and Art History Drift 10, 3512 BS Utrecht, The Netherlands, Email: Josine.H.Blok@let.uu.nl
Abstract
AbstractComparing the accounts of the deme Ikarion (IG I3 253) with those of Rhamnous (IG I3 247 bis and 253; IRhamnous 181 and 182) and Plotheia (IG I3 258), this article argues that the adjective hosios applied to a fund in Ikarion indicates that this money was dêmosios and to be used in a way pleasing to the gods. The long-standing view that hosios when applied to money means ‘free for secular use’ or ‘secular’ (e.g. LSJ s.v. σιος) is shown to be unfounded, inviting a reassessment of the meanings of hosios. The use of public money for funding cults as attested in these deme accounts sheds new light on public finance in classical Athens.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,History,Language and Linguistics,Archeology,Classics
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Democratic Civil Religion and the Kleisthenic Reforms;Polity;2024-08-22
2. Could Athenian women be counted as citizens in democratic Athens?;Citizenship in Antiquity;2023-06-02
3. Sacrilegio y ciudad en las tragedias de Sófocles;HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades;2022-12-30
4. ἱερόσυλος: un término irreligioso al servicio de la diatriba política;Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos;2021-03-02
5. CROESUS’ GREAT NEMESIS;The Cambridge Classical Journal;2019-02-26