Neo-Luddism in the Shadow of Luddism

Author:

Tunç Yusuf Erdem1,Öcal Aslan Tolga2

Affiliation:

1. Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Karadeniz Technical University Trabzon Turkey

2. Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Marmara University İstanbul Turkey

Abstract

Abstract Technology is adopted regardless of its results; however, technology does not always result in absolute progress. The Luddites, the first movement to resist the effects of technology, made a series of uprisings in the nineteenth century, and even today they represent anxiety against technology. Neo-Luddism, as the successor of Luddism, peacefully opposes technology’s adverse effects with a distinct identity. This study evaluates the role Neo-Luddites can play in countering technology’s consequences. The study examines the Neo-Luddite perspective on technology, which seeks to find its own identity between the optimism of scientism in the technographic world and the pessimism of Luddism, considering the consequences of technology on employment and work. Neo-Luddites should emphasize technology’s political side, establish an identity, and determine their methods. Through these efforts, Neo-Luddites can raise awareness of technology’s adverse effects, build pressure on social policies and legal regulations, and shape society’s perspective of technology.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Development,Education,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science)

Reference106 articles.

1. Acemoglu, Daron and Pascual Restrepo. 2017. “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets.” Working Paper 23285, National Bureau of Economic Research.

2. Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in US Manufacturing;Acemoglu, Daron

3. Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth;Aghion, Philippe

4. Search For ‘Tablet’ On Amazon

5. Information Technology and Tomorrow’s Manager;Applegate, Lynda M.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3