Affiliation:
1. Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Karadeniz Technical University Trabzon Turkey
2. Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Marmara University İstanbul Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Technology is adopted regardless of its results; however, technology does not always result in absolute progress. The Luddites, the first movement to resist the effects of technology, made a series of uprisings in the nineteenth century, and even today they represent anxiety against technology. Neo-Luddism, as the successor of Luddism, peacefully opposes technology’s adverse effects with a distinct identity. This study evaluates the role Neo-Luddites can play in countering technology’s consequences. The study examines the Neo-Luddite perspective on technology, which seeks to find its own identity between the optimism of scientism in the technographic world and the pessimism of Luddism, considering the consequences of technology on employment and work. Neo-Luddites should emphasize technology’s political side, establish an identity, and determine their methods. Through these efforts, Neo-Luddites can raise awareness of technology’s adverse effects, build pressure on social policies and legal regulations, and shape society’s perspective of technology.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Development,Education,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science)
Reference106 articles.
1. Acemoglu, Daron and Pascual Restrepo. 2017. “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets.” Working Paper 23285, National Bureau of Economic Research.
2. Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in US Manufacturing;Acemoglu, Daron
3. Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth;Aghion, Philippe
4. Search For ‘Tablet’ On Amazon
5. Information Technology and Tomorrow’s Manager;Applegate, Lynda M.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献