Affiliation:
1. School of Interdisciplinary Global Studies, University of South Florida Tampa, FL USA
Abstract
Abstract
To conduct their work, Human-Animal Studies scholars, practitioners, and activists need to understand how different nations treat animals. Although extant cross-national measures of the treatment of animals are helpful, they are quantitatively unsophisticated, narrow in focus, and nontransparent. This paper offers a sounder methodology for measuring how nations treat animals. Using polychoric factor analysis of nine indicators that capture the treatment of animals in 154 nations, this study creates three new Treatment-of-Animals measures: Political-Commitment, Animal-Use, and a Composite-Score (the average between the previous two measures). A construct validity test demonstrates that all three measures are valid. The study then reports how different nations and regions fare on each measure and discusses important trends that these outcomes reveal. The paper concludes by explaining how scholars, practitioners, and activists will benefit from these new Treatment-of-Animals variables, and it confronts some limitations with these measures.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,General Veterinary
Reference77 articles.
1. Stop circus suffering
2. Federal circus bill: Worldwide summary
3. 2018 U.S. animal protection laws rankings: Comparing overall strengths and comprehensiveness
4. What’s wrong with factory farming?;Anomaly, J.
5. The rise of critical animal studies: Putting theory into action and animal liberation into higher education;Best, S.