Affiliation:
1. Department of History, Sociology and Anthropology, Southern Utah University Cedar City, UT USA
2. Department of Psychology, Southern Utah University Cedar City, UT USA
Abstract
Abstract
Primate nature documentaries have been popular with audiences since their inception in the early 1900s. Audiences trust primate documentaries, but scholars are concerned about how documentaries sometimes misrepresent primates. We provide an analysis of the history of primate documentaries, with a focus on how and why misrepresentation happens. We summarize why wildlife documentaries are important, and then we explain concerns over documentaries’ mischaracterization of nonhuman animals. Then, having viewed every available primate documentary (n = 210), we provide the first scholarly attempt to (a) provide a big-picture view by collating and describing the subgenres that can be used to characterize primate documentaries, and (b) describe the historical development of these subgenres, from early sensationalized films to modern large-budget productions. This history describes the chronological development of the diversity of primate documentary subgenres and explains the misrepresentation of primates as the result of filmmaker goals across that historical development.
Funder
Washington University in St. Louis
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,General Veterinary
Reference60 articles.
1. Adcroft, J. (2010). Reframing perceptions of anthropomorphism in wildlife film and documentary. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
2. Nature documentaries, connectedness to nature, and pro-environmental behavior;Arendt, F.
3. Honesty and dishonesty in documentary film making;Attenborough, D.
4. Documentary film: A very short introduction;Aufderheide, P.
5. The effect of nature documentaries on students’ environmental sensitivity: A case study;Barbas, T. A.