Public Perceptions of Mental Capacities of Nonhuman Animals

Author:

Kupsala Saara1,Vinnari Markus2,Jokinen Pekka3,Räsänen Pekka4

Affiliation:

1. 1 University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, Department of Geographical and Historical Studies Joensuu Finland Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Environmental Policy Centre Helsinki Finland saara.kupsala@uef.fi

2. 2 University of Tampere, School of Management Tampere Finland

3. 3 University of Tampere, School of Management Tampere Finland

4. 4 University of Turku, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Research Turku Finland

Abstract

Mental capacities are an essential basis on which people give moral concern to nonhuman animals. Hence, it is important to investigate public perceptions of animal mind and the factors underlying these perceptions. Although research into citizen beliefs in animal mind has been increasing, population-based studies utilizing multivariate methods have been scarce. In this article, public perceptions of animal mind are investigated with a nationwide survey in Finland (n = 1,824). Eight animal species positioned differently in cultural categorizations are included in the analysis. Dogs were ascribed the most capacities, followed by cows, pigs, wolves, and elk. Citizens expressed a low belief in the mental capacities of chicken, salmon, and shrimp. Classifying animals as companions, food, and threat influences the perceptions of animal mind. Young age, having a companion animal, valuing societal equality, and concern for animal welfare and for animal utilization are connected to a greater belief in animal mind.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,General Veterinary

Reference50 articles.

1. When closing the human–animal divide expands moral concern: The importance of framing;Bastian;Social Psychological and Personality Science,2012

2. Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption;Bastian;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2011

3. The good bad wolf—Wolf evaluation reveals the roots of the Finnish wolf conflict;Bisi;European Journal of Wildlife Research,2010

4. Emotions and cognition: A new approach to animal welfare;Boissy;Animal Welfare,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3