Affiliation:
1. Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland
GattonAustralia
Abstract
Abstract
Animal protection organizations expect their staff to understand and support high welfare standards in animal production. Relationships between Australian animal protection organization workers’ knowledge of chicken production systems, purchasing behavior, and opinion-leading behavior were investigated. Forty-five percent of knowledge questions were answered correctly. Knowledge was mostly gained from animal protection organizations and online literature. Knowledgeable respondents were more critical of both conventional and free range/organic chicken systems and were more likely to avoid eating chicken meat, but not eggs. They were more likely to approach those responsible, in government or industry, about welfare issues and were more likely to discuss animal welfare issues at work and in a social setting. They were also more likely to ask questions about animal welfare standards of food provided at butchers, farmers’ markets, social meals, and restaurants/cafés. Therefore, knowledge was linked to advocacy for improved animal welfare by animal protection organization workers.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,General Veterinary
Reference26 articles.
1. Australian Chicken Meat Federation Inc.;General Questions: Growing Meat Chickens,2011
2. Cognitive dissonance and individuals’ response strategies as a basis for audience segmentation to reduce factory farmed meat consumption, Southern Cross Business School;Bergmann;Southern Cross University ePublications@scu,2010
3. Organic food and the double adverse selection: ignorance and social welfare.;Biondo;Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems,2014
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献