Affiliation:
1. University of ChesterUnited Kingdom
2. University of BristolUnited Kingdom
Abstract
Many living with companion animals hope for “good relationships” based on trust, mutuality, and cooperation. Relationships develop from mutual actions, yet research often overlooks nonhumans as mindful actors within relationships. This is a study of horse/human dyads, using multimethod approaches intended to include horses as participants. We ask: can “good relationships” be observed, especially when the pair know each other well? We studied familiar/unfamiliar pairs, negotiating simple obstacles, to explore qualities of cooperation between pairs. Interviews with human participants elicited perceptions of horses’ “personalities” and reactions. We analyzed video recordings of interactions and also showed them to external observers. We identified differences in attention, tension and coordination: familiar pairs were more coordinated, mutually attentive, and less tense, and they showed less resistance. That is, some relationships displayed discernible qualities of “working together.” We cannot know nonhuman animals’ experiences, but knowing how they behave says something about their agency within interspecies relationships.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,General Veterinary
Reference30 articles.
1. Toward a privileging of the nonverbal: Communication, corporeal synchrony and transcendence in horses and humans;Argent,2012
2. “Learning to speak horse”: The culture of “natural horsemanship”;Birke;Society &Animals,2007
3. Talking about horses: Control and freedom in the world of “natural horsemanship”;Birke;Society &Animals,2008
4. Mutual corporeality: Gender and human/horse relationships;Birke;Women’s Studies International Forum,2009
5. On investigating human—animal bonds: Realities, relatings, research;Birke,2012
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献