Affiliation:
1. University of Oxford, Ian Ramsey Centre for Science and Religion34 St. Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LDUK
Abstract
Many contemporary scholars believe that all experience is dependent upon language and culture, meaning that it is unintelligible to speak of some cross-cultural event which can be called “mystical” or “religious”; and that the notion of the origins of religious beliefs lying in such experiences is thus methodologically and theoretically unsound. Challenges to these perspectives leave one open to charges of naivety, or of having crossed a boundary from the (ostensibly) objective Study of Religions into a kind of universalist crypto-theology. In defense of the study of such experiences, this article attempts to demonstrate the weaknesses in these arguments by showing that they are based upon a number of mutually-reliant but unproven culturally-situated philosophical axioms. With particular reference to near-death and out-of-body experiences, a reflexive, theoretically eclectic approach to this area of study is suggested.
Reference59 articles.
1. Mysticism and its contents;Almond,1990
2. Religious Experience, Justification, and History
3. Explaining the unexplainable: Wayne Proudfoot’s “Religious Experience.”;Barnard;Journal of the American Academy of Religion,1992
4. Rejoinder;Barnard;Journal of the American Academy of Religion,1993
5. Phenomenology of near-death experiences: a cross-cultural perspective;Belanti;Transcultural Psychiatry,2008
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献