Affiliation:
1. American University in Cairo
Abstract
William James stands at the nexus of two intellectual traditions important to religious studies: phenomenology of religion and radical empiricism. Focusing on James’s work, I identify three essential points of contact between radical empiricism and phenomenology of religion: epoché, the affective character of consciousness, and the inevitably open-ended nature of experience. I argue that these resonances allow them to be integrated, thereby furnishing a more robust and defensible understanding of the category of “experience.” This integrated approach responds to recent criticisms of phenomenology of religion, and describes a complimentary relationship between it and other, explanatory approaches to the study of religion and religious experience.
Reference27 articles.
1. Phenomenology of religion;Allen,1987
2. Retrieving phenomenology of religion as a method for religious studies;Blum;Journal of the American Academy of Religion,2012
3. Philosophical issues: Phenomenology,2012
4. Radical empiricism and phenomenology: Philosophy and the pure stuff of experience;Drabinski;The Journal of Speculative Philosophy,1993
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献