Affiliation:
1. School of Arts, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, Noah.Riseman@acu.edu.au
Abstract
Abstract
Until November 1992 the Australian military had longstanding rules against the presence of lesbian, gay and bisexual (lgb) service members. The policies and practices for dealing with lgb people varied across time and services, but one commonality is that rarely did cases go to court martial and were generally dealt with through administrative and other disciplinary processes. Yet, the rare cases which did go to court martial leave a hitherto overlooked archival trail that provides insight into how the Australian armed forces conceptualised and policed homosexuality within its ranks. This article examines data from courts martial in the Royal Australian Navy (ran), focusing especially on cases from the period after the Second World War. Exploring three case studies, it shows how courts martial were not so much about policing homosexuality, but rather prosecuting unsolicited advances and incidents which breached the unspoken bounds of discretion.
Reference38 articles.
1. Military Justice Procedures in the Australian Defence Force,1999
2. The Effectiveness of Australia’s Military Justice System,2005
3. Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and a Doctor: Medical Attitudes toward Homosexuality and the Court Martial of Dr. Percy Ryberg.;Barrett, Matthew.,2020
4. The Rise, Fall and Proposed Rebirth of the Australian Military Court.;Burmester, Henry.,2011
5. The Statute of Westminster and the Murder in hmas Australia, 1942.;Clark, Chris.,2009
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献