Affiliation:
1. Illinois Institute of TechnologyUSA
Abstract
This paper not only describes a confusing network of terms (including “political society”, “commonwealth”, and “community”), thus defining a problem of interpretation, but also partially solves the problem. One result is that Locke turns out to differ in at least one important way from those theorists of social contract supposedly belonging to the same tradition, especially Hobbes, Rousseau, and Rawls. The Two Treatises lacks any social contract, that is, a contract constituting society in the inclusive sense usually given “society” in discussions of “social contract”. Locke’s concept of “political society” deserves a closer look, since it has largely been overlooked until now.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. THE POLITICS OF BUILDING CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF GEORGIA AND ARMENIA;Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi;2024-06-30
2. The normative and descriptive aspects of Locke’s state of nature;Theoria, Beograd;2023
3. Ideas In Context;In the Shadow of Leviathan;2020-02-29
4. Index;In the Shadow of Leviathan;2020-02-29
5. Bibliography;In the Shadow of Leviathan;2020-02-29