Affiliation:
1. York University Department of Humanities and the Program of Social and Political Thought https://dx.doi.org/7991 Toronto Canada
Abstract
Abstract
It is common in accounts of the secularization of Western thought to make reference to the name of Nietzsche. Nietzsche is undeniably a critic of religion, but he is equally a critic of the secular. It is for this reason that I propose thinking about Nietzsche’s philosophy as postsecular. This term is one that has evolved over the last couple decades in response to the so-called “return of the religious” in society, social theory, and philosophy and suggests that secularity and religiosity are not antithetical and therefore that we must move beyond the forms of thinking that would regard them as such. First, I focus on his concepts of will to power, interpretation, perspectivism, and history, and sketch how they are all interrelated and how these ground his interpretation of religion. Based on this view, I show, second, that while religion is, for Nietzsche, a historical perspective, it is also, for him, part of the historical genealogy of secularity. This point leads to my final one on the relationship between secularity and religion in Nietzsche’s thought, where I argue that, on his own terms, Nietzsche’s anti-Christianity is a hyper-Christianity, even while rejecting facets of Christianity.
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Reference50 articles.
1. Assam, A. Nietzsche Versus Paul (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015).
2. Berger, P. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (New York and Toronto: Anchor Books, 1967).
3. Blumenberg, H. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, trans. R.M. Wallace (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983).
4. Burkert, W. Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical, trans. J. Raffan (Blackwell Publishing, 1985).
5. Casanova, J. Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)