Affiliation:
1. 1Department of Political Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
Abstract
AbstractThis paper explores explanatory practices of macro-historical social science in light of philosophical stances on determinism versus indeterminism. Analysis of determinism and its implications show its compatibility with practices emphasizing causal complexity, contingency, and choice. It can, moreover, clarify and contain these practices in ways that extend the priority traditionally given to causal explanation by macro-historical social scientists. Analysis of indeterminism shows, by contrast, that each of its major varieties challenge macro-historical explanatory practices. To embrace indeterminism and follow through its implications would, in effect, terminate the tradition of macro-historical inquiry as pursued by American sociologists and political scientists.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Contingentism for historians;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2022-12
2. Korea’s Early COVID-19 Response: Findings and Implications;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2021-08-05
3. Process Tracing Methods;Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft;2020
4. Process Tracing Methods;Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft;2018
5. Selecting Appropriate Cases When Tracing Causal Mechanisms;Sociological Methods & Research;2016-01-13