Affiliation:
1. Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution, George Mason University 3351 N. Fairfax Drive, MSN 4D3, Arlington, VA 22201 USA
Abstract
Abstract
With the global proliferation of the liberal peace agenda, there has been an increase in attention to the participation of non-governmental organizations (NGO s) in the development and support of national peace agendas. However, with the rise of authoritarian states around the world, and the closing of civic spaces, NGO s have become constrained and limited in their actions. We often see autocratic and repressive regimes not welcoming the implementation of any initiatives that fall outside the scope of their official negotiation platforms, and therefore, limiting the participation of their citizens in unofficial peacebuilding initiatives. Through the application of the authoritarian conflict management framework, this article discusses the challenges of carrying out peacebuilding work in such non-permissive environments in the context of the South Caucasus and points out ways that local peacebuilding organizations and peace activists work around these restrictions to negotiate the reconciliation space that they are attempting to create.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference48 articles.
1. Interactive Peacemaking: A People-Centered Approach;Allen, Susan H.
2. Introduction: Civil Society in Central Asia and the Caucasus.;Babajanian, Babken
3. Spatialising Peace and Conflict: Mapping the Production of Places, Sites and Scales of Violence
4. Peacebuilding and Spatial Transformation: Peace, Space and Place;Bjorkdahl, Annika
5. Allies or Adversaries: NGOs and the State in Africa;Brass, Jennifer N.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献