Affiliation:
1. Associate Professor, Institute of Political Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Abstract
Abstract
Latin American politics are widely characterized by legalismo: a set of practices that can be traced to the notion of a continental or regional, American or Latin American International Law (AIL/LAIL) including the American international congresses and treaties, the practice of invoking AIL/LAIL’s various principles, and the use of judicial and quasi-judicial means of conflict resolution. However, it is far less clear where the origins of Latin America’s legalismo culture lay. Moreover, why did this formalistic-legalistic culture not take root in other regions? The article uses an original comparative historical approach to show that legalismo was a product of two conditions unique to Latin America: the distinctive security needs of its newly independent states and the time of independence. In comparison with Southeast Asia and Africa, I argue that legalismo was central to Latin America’s regional idea but that the practical impact of international law was not stronger than elsewhere.
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,History
Reference86 articles.
1. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order;Acharya, Amitav
2. Culture, Security, Multilateralism: The “ASEAN Way” and Regional Order;Acharya, Amitav
3. Memoria sobre la conveniencia y objetos de un congreso jeneral americano (1844);Alberdi, Juan Bautista
4. La ciencia del derecho internacional;Alcorta, Amancio
5. Latin America and International Law;Álvarez, Alejandro
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献