Affiliation:
1. Union Institute & University, Cincinnati, OH, USA, chris.voparil@myunion.edu
Abstract
Abstract
This response to insightful commentaries on my book, from Richard Shusterman, Susan Dieleman, Raff Donelson, and Colin Koopman, takes up the recurring theme of the nature of normativity on a Rortyan view. To frame my individual replies, I revisit the Davidsonian account of epistemic interaction that influences Rorty’s mature view and suggest that the norms implicit in Davidsonian triangulation are insufficient to support Rorty’s antiauthoritarianism in ethics and epistemology. To address the resulting question of how to account for norms of responsibility and obligation within Rorty’s thought, I highlight key strands of the pragmatic tradition, originating with Peirce but extending through James, Addams, and Dewey, that Rorty reconstructs in the process of developing the full implications of prioritizing democracy over philosophy.
Reference62 articles.
1. Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion;Atkins, Richard Kenneth.,2016
2. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political;Benhabib, Seyla,1996
3. Peirce’s Theory of Perception;Bernstein, Richard J.,1964
4. Action, Conduct, and Self-Control;Bernstein, Richard J.,1965
5. John Dewey;Bernstein, Richard J.,1966