Affiliation:
1. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, USA, sdielem@siue.edu
Abstract
Abstract
Chris Voparil’s Reconstructed Pragmatism provides an opportunity to reconsider existing debates from a new pragmatist vantage point, one that takes seriously Rorty’s contribution to the tradition. In this commentary, I take advantage of this vantage point to briefly reconsider debates about deliberative democracy, including pragmatist contributions to them. Typically, such debates revolve around either the ethical/political constraints or the epistemic benefits of deliberation. Yet Voparil’s redrawn pragmatist map reconfigures the relationship between the ethical/political and epistemic dimensions of communities engaged in democratic deliberation. I use the vantage point made accessible by Voparil’s map to think about how the ethical/political and epistemic are simultaneously instantiated in the creation and expansion of communities, which suggests many existing attempts to justify or explain democratic deliberation are misguided.
Reference10 articles.
1. The Contingent Status of Epistemic Norms: Rorty, Kantian Pragmatisms, and Feminist Epistemologies;Dieleman, Susan.,2013
2. Epistemic Justice and Democratic Legitimacy;Dieleman, Susan.,2015
3. Realism, Pragmatism, and Critical Social Epistemology;Dieleman, Susan.,2017
4. Abnormal Justice;Fraser, Nancy.,2017
5. Taking Rorty Seriously: Pragmatism, Metaphilosophy, and Truth;Gascoigne, Neil,2020