Present status and future of nematode systematics

Author:

Coomans August

Abstract

AbstractSince phylogenetic systematics became generally accepted and especially since informatics and molecular techniques for phylogenetic analysis were developed, systematics has undergone a conceptual and methodological revolution. Taxonomy, on the contrary, suffered a decline. Poor descriptions, too much routine work and low citation rates hampered it. As a result, the discipline became less attractive to young scientists. With only a small fraction of the biodiversity known, this situation will lead to serious problems in the future in all those fields of nematology depending on a correct identification of species. Phylogenetic analyses of nematodes have been mainly based on morphology, supplemented with developmental characters, but in recent years molecular methods have provided entirely new data sets. Phylogenetic estimates derived from independent data may provide new insights in character homologies through reciprocal illumination. Classifications of nematodes were often biased according to the expertise of the author and were only recently based on the principles of phylogenetic systematics. Recently, molecular and morphological data have been used to support a new overall classification with only (presumably) monophyletic taxa. In this classification plant, as well as animal, parasitic taxa are hierarchically downgraded in accordance with their phylogenetic history. Species occupy an important position in all aspects of biology, therefore the species concept matters. It determines, for example, the outcome of biodiversity assessments, distribution patterns, etc. However, several problems remain to be solved before a consensus will be reached about the choice of a concept. Future research in nematode systematics should comprise well-focused taxonomy based on a combination of classical and modern methods in a way that can raise the interest of young scientists as well as of funding agencies. It should be realised that, with the dwindling present taxonomic expertise, this is a very urgent matter.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3